Tried to argue with my uncle about the moon landing using two totally different methods
At the family BBQ in Dayton last weekend, he started up again about the 'fake' Apollo 11 footage. I used to just yell facts, but this time I brought my laptop and calmly pulled up the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal from NASA.gov, showing the exact camera model and film type. He was using a grainy YouTube video from 2009 about 'impossible shadows'. The difference was having a primary source with specific technical data versus a vague, edited video. Has anyone else found that bringing one solid, documented piece of evidence works better than trying to counter every wild claim?