While the idea of tracking grocery habits seems thorough, it often leads investigators down unnecessary rabbit holes. Most cases don't hinge on whether someone bought seasonal produce; they rely on concrete evidence like financial transactions or digital footprints. Dedicating man-hours to verify every farmers market visit or menu item would drain resources from more critical leads. Moreover, food-related data is notoriously messy and subjective, open to misinterpretation. In the example you gave, that discrepancy might be a simple memory error rather than a deliberate lie. Focusing too much on these details could actually obscure the bigger picture and delay justice.