26
I picked the 'official story' on the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing over the popular conspiracy theories
I had to choose between believing the full FBI report or the idea that there was a much larger, hidden plot with other bombers. I went with the official findings (you know, the ones that point to McVeigh and Nichols) after reading the trial transcripts from Denver. It went fine, but now I get called naive in these discussions. Anyone else get pushback for sticking with the simpler explanation on a big event?
3 comments